Forums/NHL Signings

Philadelphia Flyers signed Oskar Lindblom (3 Years / $3,000,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options

 

Jul 22 at 1:11
#1
Oskar Lindblom has signed a new contract with the Philadelphia Flyers.
STANDARD CONTRACT (EXTENSION)
COMPARE THIS CONTRACT
LENGTH: 3 YEARS
EXPIRY STATUS: RFA
SIGNING TEAM: Philadelphia FlyersPhiladelphia Flyers
VALUE: $9,000,000
C.H.% : 3.68
SIGNING DATE: July 22, 2020
SOURCE: CapFriendly
SEASONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV P. BONUSES S. BONUSES BASE SALARY TOTAL SALARY MINORS SALARY
2020-21$3,000,000$3,000,000$0$400,000$2,000,000$2,400,000$2,400,000
2021-22$3,000,000$3,000,000$0$0$2,600,000$2,600,000$2,600,000
2022-23$3,000,000$3,000,000$0$0$4,000,000$4,000,000$4,000,000
TOTAL$9,000,000$9,000,000$0$400,000$8,600,000$9,000,000$9,000,000
Jul 22 at 1:15
#2
Dom6Yotes
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 243
Likes: 252
*Everybody liked that*
ALitteral, Emoon, MaxDomi13 and 21 others liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:16
#3
best poster
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 1,278
very good
Emoon liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:21
#4
:/
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 151
Likes: 42
Respect to the organization. Guys gonna come back stronger and better. 💪
MaxDomi13, SuckMyAvs, Canucks_Fan69 and 1 other person liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:21
#5
Just Keep Swimming
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 5,624
Likes: 2,566
I had no idea what he was going to be able to get, so good for him for getting a decent payday despite everything going on.
SuckMyAvs and KubaH liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:28
#6
Hugh Hefner of CF
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 2,802
Only 30 games played.
There must be news on his recovery that is not being shared.
Jul 22 at 1:29
#7
Go Jets Go
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 840
Alright that's it, WHO VOTED NO! I just wanna talk...
DirtyDangles, SuckMyAvs, ALitteral and 10 others liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:29
#8
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 11,073
Likes: 2,163
This is fantastic for both parties. If he is able to continue playing, the Flyers get a great top 6 winger for cheap and if he isn't, the organization did the right thing and took care of one of their players.
Zubrowka, EmpressKayla and gregb569 liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:35
#9
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 11,073
Likes: 2,163
Quoting: Trickster
Only 30 games played.
There must be news on his recovery that is not being shared.


His treatment is done and he has been skating. Has been on the ice for about a month.
Trickster, ConnorMcHellebucyk, Zubrowka and 3 others liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:37
#10
Hugh Hefner of CF
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 2,802
Quoting: DirtyDangles
His treatment is done and he has been skating. Has been on the ice for about a month.


Thanks for sharing
DirtyDangles liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:43
#11
Oui non grille-pain
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 5,940
Likes: 1,307
That's amazing! It looks like his career is gonna continue where it left off, and I am very happy about that.

As for the contract, it's a tad risky given what Lindblom just went through, but if he's anywhere near his old form, it'll look like a massive steal.
KubaH and oneX liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:50
#12
Hammock enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 945
It’s great that he was able to pull through this and get a good paycheck

I hate to be the pessimist but can someone explain what he’s done on the ice to earn this?

Or is it in hopes that he will grow and become a steal on this contract?
KubaH liked this.
Jul 22 at 1:55
#13
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 11,073
Likes: 2,163
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
It’s great that he was able to pull through this and get a good paycheck

I hate to be the pessimist but can someone explain what he’s done on the ice to earn this?

Or is it in hopes that he will grow and become a steal on this contract?


He was on pace for a 50 point year...i'll take that at $3 mil per every day of the week. He has got better every year he has been with the team.
ConnorMcHellebucyk liked this.
Jul 22 at 2:01
#14
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 164
Likes: 72
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
It’s great that he was able to pull through this and get a good paycheck

I hate to be the pessimist but can someone explain what he’s done on the ice to earn this?

Or is it in hopes that he will grow and become a steal on this contract?


He was leading the team in goals and playing top line minutes with Couturier when he went out. Realistically, I see him slotting with Coots and TK for a line that matches up against other top lines leaving some other guys (Giroux, Voracek, JVR, etc) to take advantage of lesser opponents.
Jul 22 at 2:52
#15
yinzguhyz.com
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 50
Likes: 13
Good for him! Has got to feel great to have legitimate professional support after such a traumatic health experience. If he gets back to where he was and continues improving, this turns out to be a steal for the team as well.

Makes me wonder though, what they'll do with Patrick.. Has he recovered yet? Will he? And will he try to get similar money?

Besides his draft pedigree I haven't seen much from him yet at the NHL level.
Jul 22 at 2:54
#16
bhavikp27
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 4,689
Likes: 1,590
Looking forward to see him play again

Quoting: DSZ
*Everybody liked that*


Well, some clown didn't. As usual
ALitteral, HabsFan9 and msekkes liked this.
Jul 23 at 12:43
#17
Lafreniere to NYR
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 6,062
Likes: 1,457
Wish the best for Oskar. I've seen the worst of what happens to certain patients being a Medical Scribe and working with oncologists occasionally. The type of degrading and unfortunate processes these patients have to go through is very difficult and especially to go through it, come back, and play competitive hockey is very admirable. I wish him and his family well.
Bf3351 liked this.
Jul 23 at 3:24
#18
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,611
Likes: 1,577
Quoting: Rooney
Alright that's it, WHO VOTED NO! I just wanna talk...


I voted no because I thought it needed to be a 1 year deal. Unless the question mark was removed in the organization then it is a good deal. If not then it is a bad deal.
Jul 23 at 3:25
#19
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,611
Likes: 1,577
Quoting: bhavikp27
Looking forward to see him play again



Well, some clown didn't. As usual


A clown calling someone a clown, always love that!
Jul 23 at 3:29
#20
Go Jets Go
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 840
Quoting: Bf3351
I voted no because I thought it needed to be a 1 year deal. Unless the question mark was removed in the organization then it is a good deal. If not then it is a bad deal.


I wanted to talk before I realized you were the Tom Wilson of ACGM...carry on.
bhavikp27 and sens2020 liked this.
Jul 23 at 3:36
#21
bhavikp27
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 4,689
Likes: 1,590
Quoting: Bf3351
A clown calling someone a clown, always love that!


(That's what you just did)

And you're the one who did that tears of joy
Jul 23 at 3:42
#22
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,611
Likes: 1,577
Edited Jul 23 at 3:47
Quoting: bhavikp27
(That's what you just did)

And you're the one who did that tears of joy


I said I was one of the ones that hit no on here.

Why would you commit 3M for 3 years for someone who isn't healthy? Not to sound insensitive. It's common sense.

I stated above that if the organization knows something we don't like if he is cured/healthy then it is a good deal. If not, it is a bad deal.

Of course he can ride LTIR, but is that really practical if you know the person could possibly be riding it most of the time on his contract?

In my opinion, a one year deal made way more sense. Hopefully he is cured/healthy.

That kind of stuff might be a bit above your comprehension level though.
Jul 23 at 3:49
#23
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,611
Likes: 1,577
Quoting: Rooney
I wanted to talk before I realized you were the Tom Wilson of ACGM...carry on.


I did, but with The Incompetent Bhavikp27
Rooney liked this.
Jul 23 at 3:49
#24
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 527
Likes: 202
Quoting: Bf3351
I said I was one of the ones that hit no on here.

Why would you commit 3M for 3 years for someone who isn't healthy? Not to sound insensitive. It's common sense.

I stated above that if the organization knows something we don't like if he is cured/healthy then it is a good deal. If not, it is a bad deal.

Of course he can ride LTIR, but is that really practical if you know the person could possibly be riding it most of the time on his contract?

In my opinion, a one year deal made way more sense. Hopefully he is cured/healthy.

That kind of stuff might be a bit above your comprehension level though.


Im pretty srue they came out a month or so ago and said he is cured...
Jul 23 at 3:52
#25
bhavikp27
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 4,689
Likes: 1,590
Quoting: Bf3351
I said I was one of the ones that hit no on here.

Why would you commit 3M for 3 years for someone who isn't healthy? Not to sound insensitive. It's common sense.

I stated above that if the organization knows something we don't like if he is cured/healthy then it is a good deal. If not, it is a bad deal.


They wouldn't sign him to a 3Y deal if they weren't confident/almost sure about that.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit