SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sell Resign and ReTool

Created by: jcambers
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 27, 2024
Published: Jan. 27, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
*resign Hanifin (8yrx7.25M)
*resign Greer (3yrx0.933M)
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Necas, Martin
  2. Raanta, Antti
  3. 2024 1st round pick (CAR)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (CAR)
  5. 2026 5th round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
*Raanta is a cap dump, essentially
CAR
  1. Markström, Jacob ($1,000,000 retained)
2.
CGY
  1. Byram, Bowen
  2. 2025 6th round pick (COL)
  3. 2026 2nd round pick (COL)
COL
  1. Lindholm, Elias ($1,300,000 retained)
Additional Details:
6th Rd Pick for Retention (optional)
3.
CGY
  1. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
  2. 2024 4th round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
*4th for rention
VAN
  1. Tanev, Christopher ($2,000,000 retained)
4.
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$80,840,832$0$227,500$2,659,168
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,100,000$7,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$855,833$855,833
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$832,500$832,500
RW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$813,333$813,333 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,850,000$3,850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 27 at 4:19 p.m.
#1
PDG over PDO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 4,101
Canucks pass we aren't paying a 1st for Tanev
Jan. 27 at 4:19 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Comical overpay. Markstrom at 5 still isn't good for a .909 goalie. Raanta's been WAY better since coming back up and you want Necas? Absolute joke. Drop Necas, drop the first and MAYBE Carolina consider.
Jan. 27 at 4:21 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 404
Quoting: theleano1
Canucks pass we aren't paying a 1st for Tanev


Carolina hangs up
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 27 at 4:23 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 167
Likes: 39
Canes aren't paying that much for Markstrom and he doesn't seem like the kind of goalie they'd go after anyway
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 27 at 4:27 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,404
Likes: 9,045
Not a prayer instant decline from COL. 1 goal in 24 games has a tendency to decrease value and COL wouldn’t have done the trade before it.
Jan. 27 at 4:32 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,365
Likes: 19,587
Flames aren't retaining on Markstrom, Edwards would rather pay Huberdeau double than pay someone to play for another team for 2.5 years. That's also way too much from Carolina

Buffalo isn't trading Cozens, he will likely be their #1 center in a year or 2. We shouldn't trade Coronato either.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 27 at 4:34 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,256
Likes: 6,240
Ah, a quantity offer for cozens. I mean a quick look at the Sabres prospect pool and you would see the Sabres have 5 recent first round picks that are undersized forwards. Adding vladar and a second adds nothing. Of course the Sabres decline.
wojme, BUFF36, AntiAnalytics and 1 other person liked this.
Jan. 27 at 4:37 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,365
Likes: 19,587
Quoting: Caniac2000
Comical overpay. Markstrom at 5 still isn't good for a .909 goalie. Raanta's been WAY better since coming back up and you want Necas? Absolute joke. Drop Necas, drop the first and MAYBE Carolina consider.


It's absolutely an overpayment but Markstrom is better than all of Carolina'a goalies by a landslide. Come on man
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 27 at 4:38 p.m.
#9
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 3,682
For the 47th time: the Avs aren't giving you Byram AND a 1st for a Lindy rental. Actually, they aren't doing either because they don't do things like that for rentals. But nice job adding the 6th "for retention" as if you're doing the Avs a favor.
TJTwolf and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 27 at 4:39 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,365
Likes: 19,587
Quoting: theleano1
Canucks pass we aren't paying a 1st for Tanev


He'll probably end up somewhere else then. Quinn won't be happy though
Jan. 27 at 4:43 p.m.
#11
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 276
Likes: 77
Quoting: Caniac2000
Comical overpay. Markstrom at 5 still isn't good for a .909 goalie. Raanta's been WAY better since coming back up and you want Necas? Absolute joke. Drop Necas, drop the first and MAYBE Carolina consider.


While I’d agree with you about it being an overpay, Marky is worth a first +. If you don’t think so, you’re wrong. On a different team, he’d be Vézina Caliber
Jan. 27 at 4:45 p.m.
#12
PDG over PDO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 4,101
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
He'll probably end up somewhere else then. Quinn won't be happy though


That'd be fine by Vancouver, we can use that pick and get a top 6 forward instead, Quinn has survived 4 years without him already he can survive another 40 games, he'd be much happier if we can bring in a piece that brings us over the top by trading that pick for someone with a higher celling
Turkish_Canuck liked this.
Jan. 27 at 4:51 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,365
Likes: 19,587
Quoting: Xqb15a
Not a prayer instant decline from COL. 1 goal in 24 games has a tendency to decrease value and COL wouldn’t have done the trade before it.


These kind of posts are hilarious to me you say that like he hasn't been effective. Lindholm's taken 128 shots this year, which is tied for 55th in the league. The puck just won't go in the back of the net for him, what do you want him to do? Have you ever played Blackjack and the dealer just pulls 20 and 21 over and over again? That's Lindholm right now, he's scored on 6.25% of his shots. His shooting percentage over his entire time in Calgary before this was 15.4%, that would be 20 goals and 43 points right now instead of 8 and 31.
Jan. 27 at 4:55 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,365
Likes: 19,587
Quoting: theleano1
That'd be fine by Vancouver, we can use that pick and get a top 6 forward instead, Quinn has survived 4 years without him already he can survive another 40 games, he'd be much happier if we can bring in a piece that brings us over the top by trading that pick for someone with a higher celling


I mean he literally told the team they should trade for Tanev. Bringing someone like Guentzel is going to require a 1st and Lekkerimaki as a base. Lindholm will require a 1st + Brzustewics.

This should be an all-in year by the Nucks I don't think parting with 2 1st and a top prospect is unreasonable for them to do this deadline
Jan. 27 at 4:58 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
While I’d agree with you about it being an overpay, Marky is worth a first +. If you don’t think so, you’re wrong. On a different team, he’d be Vézina Caliber


Then keep him. He's not worth a 1st +, he's a .909 goaltender coming off a sub .900 season. That is not worth a 1st +, that is a comical take.
Jan. 27 at 4:58 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,804
Likes: 14,528
Good lord
Jan. 27 at 4:59 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 5,715
Likes: 4,783
Rasmus Andersson would need to be the 1st name on there
sabres89 and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 27 at 5:06 p.m.
#18
Sabres fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 4,876
Likes: 3,042
Buffalo definitely laughs at your pile of mediocre garbage, then says “ OK, that was funny. Make a real offer. “
sabres89, AntiAnalytics, gretzkyghosts and 1 other person liked this.
Jan. 27 at 6:18 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 173
Likes: 81
Cozens would cost us Andersson.
Jan. 27 at 7:20 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 982
Likes: 256
Giver you a 6th for Tanev. Hughes needs a roomy.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll