SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Value of Buchnevich

Created by: BluesReport18
Team: 2023-24 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 1, 2024
Published: Feb. 1, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I think the Lindholm trade was a good indicator of how high Buchnevichs value could be.
In comparison:
Age: Both are going to be 29 this year, with Buch being slightly younger.
Production over the past 3 seasons:
* Lindholm: 73-105-178 --> Games Played: 211 --> PPG: 0.844
* Buchnevich: 73-109-182 --> Games Played: 183 --> PPG: 0.995

So by the numbers Buchnevich is a point per game player as opposed to Lindholm who is around a 70 point player. Both play similar roles for their team as they are important at 5v5, powerplay, and penalty kill.

Now here's where the value gets interesting. Lindholm, at the moment, is a rental. There was no contract in place when he was traded and he could end up walking in free agency. While I doubt that happens it is a possibility. On the other hand Buch has an extra year on his deal, instantly making him more valuable. If the Blues were to retain 50% of that deal, his value goes up more. The only difference in value is Buch is a winger (although he can play a little center) and Lindholm is a center which is a more premium position.

So at the very least Buch is worth the same as what Lindholm got.
That value being a late first round pick, 4th round pick, B prospect, C prospect, and a top 9 cap dump.

Now realistically speaking, the extra year on Buch's deal will cost a 2nd round pick, and 50% retained would cost an additional 2nd round pick. That's a lot but salary is the name of the game in the NHL and costs a lot. The problem is, will any team be willing to give 1 first, 3 seconds, a B prospect, C prospect, and NHL player for Buch, likely not. In that case, the Blues will look for a high end prospect that would cover the cost of all the 2nd round picks. (I value 2 late seconds as 1 late first so you could also view it as 2 firsts, a 2nd, B prospect, C prospect, and an NHL player).

That value is very similar to the Timo Meier trade:
Meier got a 1st, 2nd, B+ prospect (Mukhamadullin), young NHL player with 2nd round value (Zetterlund), a C prospect (Okhotiuk), and a cap dump (Johnsson).
In the deal above you would add another 2nd for the extra year on Buch's deal.

Every contender would likely be interested in Buch but a few of the teams that have specifically been named as being interested are the Oilers, Rangers, Flyers, Red Wings, Capitals, and the Bruins. Let's mock some trades below.

I know every fan will complain that it's overvalued in the trades but you saw what it cost to get Lindholm, it will cost more for Buch. It also depends if Army wants to move him or not. The blues aren't real contenders and moving Buch would greatly accelerate the rebuild. Even though Buch is an amazing player I don't think we reach contender status until he is in his later 30s so extending him might be the wrong move.

Note in the mock trades I went with the are slightly under the value Meier got. Buch likely gets more but it gets complicated making a trade that big.

I think of all the teams trading with Detroit makes the most sense for the Blues. They have the prospects the Blues would want and a deep enough farm system where they wouldn't be hurt trading away guys.
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Buchnevich, Pavel
2$2,900,000
Buchnevich, Pavel
2$2,900,000
Buchnevich, Pavel
2$2,900,000
Buchnevich, Pavel
2$2,900,000
Buchnevich, Pavel
2$2,900,000
Buchnevich, Pavel
2$2,900,000
Trades
1.
STL
  1. Buium, Shai [Reserve List]
  2. Veleno, Joseph
  3. Wallinder, William
  4. 2024 1st round pick (DET)
Additional Details:
Value:
1st
B+ prospect (Wallinder)
Young NHL player (Veleno)
C prospect (Buium)

For these trades I'm predicting the difference between Lindholms value and Buchs value to be a young up and coming NHL player.
DET
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel ($2,900,000 retained)
2.
STL
  1. Kakko, Kaapo
  2. Othmann, Brennan
  3. Robertson, Matthew
  4. 2024 1st round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Value:
1st
B+ prospect (Othmann)
Young NHL player (Kakko)
C prospect (Robertson)

Note: I'm not a big fan of this trade for either side really. I think it would be a bad look if the Rangers gave up all this when they gave away Buch for a 2nd and Blais. As for the Blues, they're not getting any defensive prospect to be excited about here and that's what they need.
NYR
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel
3.
STL
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Broberg, Philip
  3. Ceci, Cody
  4. Yevseyev, Nikita [Reserve List]
  5. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  6. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Value:
1st
B prospect (Bourgault)
Young NHL player (Broberg)
C prospect (Yevseyev)
Cap Dump (Ceci)
Cost of players being lower value than other trades (2nd)

Note: Again, not really a fan of this trade. I don't think the Oilers could afford to sign Buch long term and I would be shocked if they gave up all this for a rental. As for the Blues, nothing truly excites me in this deal.
EDM
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel
4.
STL
  1. Lapierre, Hendrix
  2. Leonard, Ryan [Reserve List]
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (WSH)
Additional Details:
Value:
A prospect (Leonard)
Young NHL player (Lapierre)
2nd

Leonard is likely untouchable BUT if they are going to move him, it might as well be for an elite first line forward. Buch right now is what Leonard MIGHT be. So if Washington is trying to stay competitive for Ovie, this could make sense.
WSH
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel
5.
STL
  1. Alexeyev, Alexander
  2. Kuznetsov, Evgeny
  3. McMichael, Connor
  4. 2024 1st round pick (WSH)
  5. 2025 1st round pick (WSH)
Additional Details:
Value:
1st
Young NHL player (McMichael)
C prospect (Alexeyev)
1st to Dump Kuznetsov

Washington makes a lot of sense to me in a Buch trade so it's interesting to see what they have. Dumping Kuznetsov and getting Buch likely costs more than this though as I didn't even include a B prospect.
WSH
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel
6.
STL
  1. Forbort, Derek
  2. Frederic, Trent
  3. Lysell, Fabian
  4. 2025 1st round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Value:
1st
B prospect (Lysell)
Young NHL player (Frederic)
Cap Dump (Forbort)

Nothing to exciting here I just don't think Boston has the assets to acquire Buch.
BOS
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel
7.
STL
  1. Atkinson, Cam
  2. Brink, Bobby
  3. Frost, Morgan
  4. 2024 1st round pick (PHI)
Additional Details:
Value:
1st
Young NHL player (Frost)
Young NHL player (Brink)
Cap Dump (Atkinson)

The Flyers actually seem like an amazing fit for Buch but still are they really going to be buyers this early into their rebuild? They should still have their sights set on the future so I don't know if dumping future assets into Buch is a good idea. This trade I went light with the return the Blues would likely want Bonk but that would be a hard ask from the Flyers.
PHI
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the STL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYI
2025
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2026
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
39$83,500,000$111,941,844$20,000$2,240,000-$28,441,844
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,571,429$3,571,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$816,667$816,667
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$835,833$835,833
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$825,000$825,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$232,500$232K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$863,333$863,333
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$883,750$883,750
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$825,000$825,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,275,000$3,275,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$797,500$797,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 1 at 3:23 p.m.
#1
Tank it baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 6,201
Likes: 4,246
I'm not convinced Yzerman will make a trade.

But if he did I'd expect him to upgrade the D.

Buch is an excellent player and if Army decides to trade him he'll get an excellent return.
aedoran and BluesReport18 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 3:23 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 475
Likes: 164
Frederic is borderline untouchable for the bruins IMO. On pace for over 20 goals with basically no PP time, along with the added physicality he brings. Not a guy they're gonna want to part with.
Feb. 1 at 3:23 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 491
Lindholm is a center, so your analysis is off to a bad start.

Most of those are severe overpayments, especially NYR, BOS and WSH.
Feb. 1 at 3:24 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,193
Likes: 18,359
Meier was an RFA though…Buch with 1.5 years wouldn’t be eligible for extension until summer.

But comps look pretty good
Feb. 1 at 3:24 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 8,019
Likes: 3,229
I love Buch but no way in hell Caps pay close to any of that for either. They wouldn't even do Leonard straight up let alone adding Lap and a 2nd. For the 2nd trade they have cap room to keep or eat half on Kuzy for a late pick so they don't need to pay to move him. They also aren't trading their 2024 1st.

Caps and Buch aren't really a good trade partners. He's 28 and only has 1 more year on his deal after this, they aren't going to pay an arm and a leg for that. Maybe if he was 24-25 and had 4-5 more years on his deal. You need to find a team who is a great winger away from contending, that isn't the Caps.
Feb. 1 at 3:26 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 447
Likes: 242
I appreciate the fact that all of the proposed offers are as realistic as possible. I do think the Blues are not as far off from being good as people think. That said, it makes total sense to trade Buch, but they may want to have some sort of idea for a replacement, wether internally or outside the organization.
Feb. 1 at 3:30 p.m.
#7
Joe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 7,665
Likes: 5,590
I take that as a Wings guy
Feb. 1 at 3:30 p.m.
#8
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 787
Likes: 320
NYR don't consider because of Othmann. Sub him with one of Sykora/Berard and upgrade Robertson to Jones and you'd be closer.
Feb. 1 at 3:32 p.m.
#9
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,611
Likes: 6,741
Pavel Buchnevich or Jesus Christ of Nazareth?
BDHockey liked this.
Feb. 1 at 3:34 p.m.
#10
Skip skibbity
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 861
love Buch, but I'm not giving you Leonard 1 for 1, let alone the rest
Feb. 1 at 3:34 p.m.
#11
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,281
Likes: 11,359
The only ones that would interest me are the first Washington trade (and they'd sooner bang MIckey Mouse than trade Leonard) and maybe Boston.

The main issue I have is accepting 4-5-6 pieces for one player. That's just not good or realistic. Condense whatever value you think is required to 2-3 pieces max. We ain't gonna take on four contracts or let someone beef up the offer with mid picks. Condense. Distill.
Feb. 1 at 3:35 p.m.
#12
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,281
Likes: 11,359
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Pavel Buchnevich or Jesus Christ of Nazareth?


Jesus is a UFA, dude. Cmon.
Feb. 1 at 3:43 p.m.
#13
mattysmokes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 73
Likes: 33
I'd love Buch for the canes. What would a fair comp look like? 1st+Flyers 2nd+Morrow+Drury?
BluesReport18 and BDHockey liked this.
Feb. 1 at 3:44 p.m.
#14
Tank it baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 6,201
Likes: 4,246
Quoting: mokumboi
Jesus is a UFA, dude. Cmon.


Lou Lam attended The Last Supper.

He made them all shave.
aedoran liked this.
Feb. 1 at 3:45 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 215
Likes: 38
Quoting: mskiko
I'd love Buch for the canes. What would a fair comp look like? 1st+Flyers 2nd+Morrow+Drury?


That would be about right. I was very surprised that the canes haven't been linked to Buch. Maybe they will be soon we'll see he would be a great fit there.
mskiko liked this.
Feb. 1 at 3:45 p.m.
#16
Tank it baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 6,201
Likes: 4,246
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Pavel Buchnevich or Jesus Christ of Nazareth?


I thought that was Monahan? 🤔
Feb. 1 at 3:49 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,691
Likes: 12,038
Quoting: SharkTank
I'm not convinced Yzerman will make a trade.

But if he did I'd expect him to upgrade the D.

Buch is an excellent player and if Army decides to trade him he'll get an excellent return.


I don't see him doing this. Defense is definitely the priority.
Feb. 1 at 3:52 p.m.
#18
mattysmokes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 73
Likes: 33
Quoting: BluesReport18
That would be about right. I was very surprised that the canes haven't been linked to Buch. Maybe they will be soon we'll see he would be a great fit there.


Don likes to stay off the radar and all the big names we've been linked to haven't panned out (Tkachuk, Meier, Karlsson specific examples). If something were to happen it would come out of the blue like the Skjei and Trocheck trades we made a few deadlines ago.
BluesReport18 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 5:05 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 1,875
I appreciate the thought in your description but at the end of the day all of these arguments are meaningless. NHL teams decide whether they're going to trade a player or not, then worry about price -- there's no magical 'godfather' offer or breaking point at which they make decisions like that. IF (and that's a big if) the Blues decide to trade Buch, the return will be extremely predictable.

At the end of the day, he is a good (even very good!) player but not a superstar approaching 30. Those players ALWAYS go for exactly 1 first, 1 a B- to B+ prospect, and salary filler to make the deal work. Sometimes you get that extra second, sometimes you don't. Lindholm is just the latest in a long line of the exact same returns for this level of player. Horvat, Meier, DeBrincat, Bertuzzi, ROR, Tarasenko, Fiala, Giroux, Tofolli, Reinhart, Mantha are all just forward examples from the last 3 years. Add H. Lindholm, Orlov, Kuemper in there as well for even more comps or if you want to stretch back the time period a bit add in Zucker, Stone, Pacioretty, Hall, K Hayes as well.

The ONLY players who have been moved for significantly more than this are Eichel and Tkachuk -- two players who could make legitimate claims to being top 10 forwards in the league both now and at the time they were traded -- and Brandon Hagel, who had a uniquely low cap hit / buyer in Tampa. I think Buchnevich is certainly towards the higher end of players in that first group, but definitely not in the Eichel/Tkachuk tier.

The final thing I'd say is about "cap dumps." A cap dump is taking on a bad contract (especially one with many years left) in exchange for picks. Most trades for big players don't involve dumps but rather salary filler. Guys who probably are overpaid/paid for too long but are necessarily taken back to facilitate a deal. Think Craig Smith to WSH last year in the Orlov deal, Rutta/Granlund/Petry/Hoffman in the Karlsson deal, Beauvillier in the Horvat deal, and most recently Kuzmenko in the Lindholm deal. These players do not increase the value that a team gets back for taking them - it's just the cost of doing business. Ceci/Forbort/Atkinson all fall into this category and would not increase the amount of futures needed for a deal. Even Kuznetsov is bordering right on that level for that proposal, and certainly wouldn't add a whole other first rounder.
Feb. 1 at 5:14 p.m.
#20
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 4,332
Quoting: qc14
I appreciate the thought in your description but at the end of the day all of these arguments are meaningless. NHL teams decide whether they're going to trade a player or not, then worry about price -- there's no magical 'godfather' offer or breaking point at which they make decisions like that. IF (and that's a big if) the Blues decide to trade Buch, the return will be extremely predictable.

At the end of the day, he is a good (even very good!) player but not a superstar approaching 30. Those players ALWAYS go for exactly 1 first, 1 a B- to B+ prospect, and salary filler to make the deal work. Sometimes you get that extra second, sometimes you don't. Lindholm is just the latest in a long line of the exact same returns for this level of player. Horvat, Meier, DeBrincat, Bertuzzi, ROR, Tarasenko, Fiala, Giroux, Tofolli, Reinhart, Mantha are all just forward examples from the last 3 years. Add H. Lindholm, Orlov, Kuemper in there as well for even more comps or if you want to stretch back the time period a bit add in Zucker, Stone, Pacioretty, Hall, K Hayes as well.

The ONLY players who have been moved for significantly more than this are Eichel and Tkachuk -- two players who could make legitimate claims to being top 10 forwards in the league both now and at the time they were traded -- and Brandon Hagel, who had a uniquely low cap hit / buyer in Tampa. I think Buchnevich is certainly towards the higher end of players in that first group, but definitely not in the Eichel/Tkachuk tier.

The final thing I'd say is about "cap dumps." A cap dump is taking on a bad contract (especially one with many years left) in exchange for picks. Most trades for big players don't involve dumps but rather salary filler. Guys who probably are overpaid/paid for too long but are necessarily taken back to facilitate a deal. Think Craig Smith to WSH last year in the Orlov deal, Rutta/Granlund/Petry/Hoffman in the Karlsson deal, Beauvillier in the Horvat deal, and most recently Kuzmenko in the Lindholm deal. These players do not increase the value that a team gets back for taking them - it's just the cost of doing business. Ceci/Forbort/Atkinson all fall into this category and would not increase the amount of futures needed for a deal. Even Kuznetsov is bordering right on that level for that proposal, and certainly wouldn't add a whole other first rounder.


Can't argue about the salary + B prospect + late 1st package for a 1yr rental, but Buch would be a 2-yr rental, at either 5.8m or 2.9m. If no one wants to offer better than the stock rental package, no reason to do it until next season.
Feb. 1 at 5:22 p.m.
#21
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,611
Likes: 6,741
Quoting: SharkTank
I thought that was Monahan? 🤔


Honestly facts lol
Feb. 2 at 9:39 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 1,875
Quoting: A_K
Can't argue about the salary + B prospect + late 1st package for a 1yr rental, but Buch would be a 2-yr rental, at either 5.8m or 2.9m. If no one wants to offer better than the stock rental package, no reason to do it until next season.


Quite a few of those guys had much more than 1 year of team control. As always not saying that it doesn't objectively make sense but NHL GMs have a very strange perception of player value and have consistently demonstrated so
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll