SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would Hugues play for Zegras

Team: 2023-24 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 10, 2024
Published: Feb. 10, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
ANA fans won't like this, but that's the only play I would give to ANA for Zegras. I don't see how ANA are over asking for a player they seem to have given up the towel on at 22 years old. If the argument of a rebuild comes in, I'll just respond with a "he's 22... you rebuild with young players... so..." I think it's the attitude, I don't see Hugues overpaying for Zegras.

I'm guessing another team will want to over pay, maybe Philly who got crapped on by a freaking 0 games played player. They may over pay at this point.

**Some may see my move to bring in Reinbacher, even if he's in Europe right now, the reason I put him there is that there are talks they may bring him in as soon as his season ends in order to develop him properly in MTL or Laval. - Most probably in Laval, but you never know.. His size may make him jump now to see his current skills.

***Avs Fans, before you judge the Girard move, read the trade info, I think the AVS would look to get another hard hitting defensman with the room they just got from the Habs, plus the ability to trade out their own 2nd pick again. They have lots of players becoming UFAs again this year, and trading out 5M$ vs 1.925M$ gives them more room to get going for another cup run next year.
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Zegras, Trevor
Additional Details:
ANA seem ready to move from Zegras; Is this enough? I thin other teams will be playing this out, but given they receive 2 RHD, Beck and picks plus Pearson to help end the season with support for the younger guys. I think this would be the only available play for a player who's not been up to par with his attitude and defensive skills.
ANA
  1. Beck, Owen
  2. Harris, Jordan
  3. Kovacevic, Johnathan
  4. Pearson, Tanner
  5. 2024 1st round pick (MTL)
  6. 2024 3rd round pick (MIN)
Additional Details:
*1st is a conditional pick; If Habs get top 5; then ANA have the choice of the best of the two 2025 1st rounds picks they have, plus PITT's 2025 2nd round pick
2.
MTL
  1. Beaucage, Alex
  2. Girard, Samuel
Additional Details:
AVS trade out Girard and his cap hit, with Beaucage but get in return their own 2nd draft pick and Allen with retention.

This also bring in another move from AVS to trade for a bigger Defenseman somewhere else, get a very reliable 2nd goalie for this year, and a posssible chip in the offseason to trade out if they wish.
COL
  1. Allen, Jake ($1,925,000 retained)
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (COL)
Additional Details:
Habs get a home player, and a home prospect; for Allen and a 2nd pick.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$82,183,749$1,170,000$5,252,500$1,316,251
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$828,333$828,333
LD/RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$275,000$275K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 10 at 9:06 p.m.
#1
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Anaheim declines, Only the 1st has value the rest of it you can keep.
Feb. 10 at 9:06 p.m.
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,500
Likes: 25,389
We Anaheim guys have never asked for more than Owen Beck plus your 2024 first assuming that you want to trade it (see your esteemed cohort @Campabee for the somewhat complicated conditions). This is a trade that could only happen at the draft because it would be contingent upon who was available to both Anaheim and Montreal. For example, we assume that the Canadiens wouldn't want to trade the pick if Demidov were still on the board.
MoSeider53, Campabee, LosPatos and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 10 at 9:11 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1,699
Habs easily pass on that holy.

They are not giving up their top 10 pick for him.
Feb. 10 at 9:20 p.m.
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Quoting: Black61
Habs easily pass on that holy.

They are not giving up their top 10 pick for him.


No Problemo, Then Zegres will never play in Montreal.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Feb. 10 at 9:23 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1,699
Quoting: MoSeider53
No Problemo, Then Zegres will never play in Montreal.


Great I dont want him too.
Feb. 10 at 9:24 p.m.
#6
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Quoting: Black61
Great I dont want him too.


A massive rebuilding team like Montreal, Shouldn't be trading for players like Zegras. just stay the course.
Feb. 10 at 9:24 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 3,278
Quoting: OldNYIfan
We Anaheim guys have never asked for more than Owen Beck plus your 2024 first assuming that you want to trade it (see your esteemed cohort Campabee for the somewhat complicated conditions). This is a trade that could only happen at the draft because it would be contingent upon who was available to both Anaheim and Montreal. For example, we assume that the Canadiens wouldn't want to trade the pick if Demidov were still on the board.


Would you still consider if it was the WPG first instead of Beck? Let's assume the WPG pick is 25 or later. Just curious.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Feb. 10 at 9:28 p.m.
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,500
Likes: 25,389
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Would you still consider if it was the WPG first instead of Beck? Let's assume the WPG pick is 25 or later. Just curious.

Oh, I think so. Four picks in the top 35? Yeah.
Just_A_Guess liked this.
Feb. 10 at 9:31 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 3,278
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Oh, I think so. Four picks in the top 35? Yeah.


Personally, I'd rather move that pick over moving Beck.

Zegras, CGY '25 1st with conditions, WPG '27 3rd with conditions for MTL '24 1st with conditions... Now that's asset management lol
Feb. 10 at 9:31 p.m.
#10
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 6,770
Where is the evidence we've thrown the towel in on him? Frank Seravalli is the source of all Zegras rumors, and the guy has the same track record of being right about Anaheim as I do scoring with Victoria's Secret models.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Feb. 10 at 9:32 p.m.
#11
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 6,770
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Personally, I'd rather move that pick over moving Beck.

Zegras, CGY '25 1st with conditions, WPG '27 3rd with conditions for MTL '24 1st with conditions... Now that's asset management lol


No conditions, it would be a draft day trade.
Just_A_Guess liked this.
Feb. 10 at 9:32 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 3,278
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
No conditions, it would be a draft day pick.


I know, but it's based on who is available to draft.
Feb. 10 at 9:38 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1,699
Quoting: MoSeider53
A massive rebuilding team like Montreal, Shouldn't be trading for players like Zegras. just stay the course.


https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1744842893913653570?lang=en

Using a top 10 pick on a replacement level defense player whos never had 70 point seems like a bad investment.

He is always going to be a guy who you cant rely on as a top line player because he cant play against other teams best lines. He will and already does get destroyed.

Atleast with somepne like Catton or helenius even if they they end up as a 50ish point guy they can atleast be versatile enough to not have to shelter like crazy
Feb. 10 at 9:48 p.m.
#14
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,500
Likes: 25,389
Quoting: Black61
Using a top 10 pick on a replacement level defense player whos never had 70 point seems like a bad investment.

I always wondered why Cole Caufield fell to #15 after Trevor Zegras was selected ninth.

At least after this season, you can finally say CC has achieved the 60-point mark.
mv21227 liked this.
Feb. 10 at 10:00 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,187
Likes: 9,411
Quoting: Black61
https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1744842893913653570?lang=en

Using a top 10 pick on a replacement level defense player whos never had 70 point seems like a bad investment.

He is always going to be a guy who you cant rely on as a top line player because he cant play against other teams best lines. He will and already does get destroyed.

Atleast with somepne like Catton or helenius even if they they end up as a 50ish point guy they can atleast be versatile enough to not have to shelter like crazy


So would you not use a top 10 pick on Caufield? Because he’s replacement level defensively and has never had a 70 point season. Hasn’t even had a 50 point season (although he likely will this year)
OldNYIfan liked this.
Feb. 10 at 11:08 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1,699
Quoting: mv21227
So would you not use a top 10 pick on Caufield? Because he’s replacement level defensively and has never had a 70 point season. Hasn’t even had a 50 point season (although he likely will this year)


Caufields defensive metrics have improved significantly this season hes not replacement level anymore.

Caufield wasnt a top 10 pick.

Even if he was still that bad defensively doesnt that prove how stupid to suggest spending a top 10 pick on ANOTHER defensive black hole.
Feb. 10 at 11:18 p.m.
#17
Habs 7th round 1983
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 749
Wondering why Drysdale was traded to PHI and not Zegras

Just my 2 cents
Feb. 10 at 11:20 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,458
Likes: 9,095
You are smoking some serious weed with that COL trade no sane team trades a 25yr old top 4 dman locked in for 3 more seasons for a back up goalie.
LaTornade, NMAvsFan and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 10 at 11:22 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,458
Likes: 9,095
Quoting: VladislavTretiak
Wondering why Drysdale was traded to PHI and not Zegras

Just my 2 cents

Because PHI was looking for a young dman, they supposedly asked COL for Byram and COL said you are adding and that ended it.
NMAvsFan and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 10 at 11:53 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3,013
Avs trade their third best defenseman and a mediocre prospect for a backup goalie and a 2nd.

Help me understand this?
LaTornade, NMAvsFan, BStinson and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 11 at 3:25 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 314
Likes: 414
Imo Girard is easily the Avs 3rd best D atm. He’s not someone you move to free up cap for a backup goalie and depth pieces (appreciate your explanation though) Hell, i would be more inclined to move Byram than Girard at this point (not saying that i would like to trade either).
NMAvsFan and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 11 at 9:20 a.m.
#22
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,503
Likes: 3,687
Quoting: Xqb15a
You are smoking some serious weed with that COL trade no sane team trades a 25yr old top 4 dman locked in for 3 more seasons for a back up goalie.


There's some dillweed posting things around here claiming that Girard sucks and the Avs are trying to trade him and he has no value so, yeah, there are still people who think Girard is nothing more than a small, puck-moving D that isn't any good.
Xqb15a, LaTornade and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 11 at 9:49 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,458
Likes: 9,095
Quoting: NMAvsFan
There's some dillweed posting things around here claiming that Girard sucks and the Avs are trying to trade him and he has no value so, yeah, there are still people who think Girard is nothing more than a small, puck-moving D that isn't any good.


But what cracks me up is that these guys do these trades on the basis he isn’t good then when they build their rosters they drop him right into the top 4🤦🏻‍♂️
NMAvsFan, LaTornade and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 11 at 11:56 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3,013
Quoting: Xqb15a
But what cracks me up is that these guys do these trades on the basis he isn’t good then when they build their rosters they drop him right into the top 4🤦🏻‍♂️


It’s a roster with Savard on the top pairing. Top 4 isn’t saying much
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 11 at 8:47 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,609
Likes: 4,587
Easy peasy nope from the Avs. Not even close.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll