SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

We are not doing Boeser for Gallagher

Created by: mv21227
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 4, 2022
Published: Apr. 4, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
@ducharmethedominator Gallagher is a cap dump. It’s like the Canucks offering this
Trades
VAN
  1. Caufield, Cole
Additional Details:
@DucharmetheDominator thinks Gallagher and a 3rd for Boeser is fair
MTL
  1. Myers, Tyler
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
When in reality it’s the equivalent of the Canucks offering this
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$73,008,992$648,780$2,932,500$8,491,008
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$1,500,000$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:32 p.m.
#1
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
oel + dickinson for gallager + byron
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:38 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,259
Likes: 18,757
Pearson for Gallagher
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:39 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Not really. Boeser has a terrible QO and probably would walk after. Cole Caufield has a year of his ELC left and total team control. So Boeser for Gallagher and a 3rd is a much closer deal than Myers and a 3rd for Caufield.
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:42 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,365
Likes: 9,518
Quoting: Pensfan89
Not really. Boeser has a terrible QO and probably would walk after. Cole Caufield has a year of his ELC left and total team control. So Boeser for Gallagher and a 3rd is a much closer deal than Myers and a 3rd for Caufield.


Tbh there isn’t a great comparable for Boeser on the Habs roster. Even with the high QO, Boeser will sign for less than it on a long term deal

But the point is, both are terribly lopsided trades
imawesome liked this.
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:43 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Quoting: DirtyDangle
oel + dickinson for gallager + byron


And OEL 100% blocks it.
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:44 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,365
Likes: 9,518
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Pearson for Gallagher


I wouldn’t do that. Pearson has been much better this year, and has a fairly reasonable contract with less term. Only player I’d consider moving for Gallagher is OEL, and even then I’d consider keeping OEL
cooliny, CEO and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:47 p.m.
#7
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 8,120
Likes: 4,684
Quoting: DirtyDangle
oel + dickinson for gallager + byron


NO
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:49 p.m.
#8
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
NO


ld and 3c. both needs for the habs.
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:49 p.m.
#9
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,768
Likes: 31,479
Quoting: DirtyDangle
oel + dickinson for gallager + byron


See that is actually fair. 4 players with bad contracts moving around.

Granted OEL would not waive and MTL already has a plenty of LHDs so it doesn't make sense position wise.

Also Gallagher is two or three years from being on LTIR for good. His playstyle is, quite typically for power forwards, very weary, and the toll on his body will force him to retire before the contract runs it's course.
Wqrrior liked this.
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:49 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Quoting: mv21227
Tbh there isn’t a great comparable for Boeser on the Habs roster. Even with the high QO, Boeser will sign for less than it on a long term deal

But the point is, both are terribly lopsided trades


No he wouldn’t. He made his contract this way for the purpose of getting to UFA faster and bet on himself. And he sure as hell wouldn’t do it for a horrible Habs team lol.
Vancouvers only option is to qualify Boeser and hope he signs long term and make him part of the core. Or Qualify him and trade him at the deadline with 50% retention. That’s the only way they get solid return for him. And it’s going to be picks/prospects, not a top 4 RHD. This trading him nonsense is just that. Nonsense. No one will want to touch that QO unless it’s a buy low option and they get a chance to figure out if he would be willing to sign long term after his QO
Apr. 4, 2022 at 11:54 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,365
Likes: 9,518
Quoting: Pensfan89
No he wouldn’t. He made his contract this way for the purpose of getting to UFA faster and bet on himself. And he sure as hell wouldn’t do it for a horrible Habs team lol.
Vancouvers only option is to qualify Boeser and hope he signs long term and make him part of the core. Or Qualify him and trade him at the deadline with 50% retention. That’s the only way they get solid return for him. And it’s going to be picks/prospects, not a top 4 RHD. This trading him nonsense is just that. Nonsense. No one will want to touch that QO unless it’s a buy low option and they get a chance to figure out if he would be willing to sign long term after his QO


I assume any team the Canucks would trade Boeser to would be able to negotiate an extension as part of the trade
Apr. 5, 2022 at 12:04 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,405
Likes: 4,012
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Pearson for Gallagher


we don't need to take on more money for the same player. Pearson has had a nice redeeming year.
audiodave and theleano1 liked this.
Apr. 5, 2022 at 12:40 a.m.
#13
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: Pensfan89
No he wouldn’t. He made his contract this way for the purpose of getting to UFA faster and bet on himself. And he sure as hell wouldn’t do it for a horrible Habs team lol.
Vancouvers only option is to qualify Boeser and hope he signs long term and make him part of the core. Or Qualify him and trade him at the deadline with 50% retention. That’s the only way they get solid return for him. And it’s going to be picks/prospects, not a top 4 RHD. This trading him nonsense is just that. Nonsense. No one will want to touch that QO unless it’s a buy low option and they get a chance to figure out if he would be willing to sign long term after his QO


You realize Boeser’s QO is only 1 million dollars more than Gallagher’s cap hit right? I’d soooooooo much rather have Boeser and 7.5 than Gallagher at 6.5. Brad Hunt is our 7th d-man and he currently has a higher point per game average this season than Gallagher. He’s our 7th d-man.
mv21227 and Canucks123 liked this.
Apr. 5, 2022 at 12:50 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 4,065
Likes: 1,938
As a fan of neither team this trade is worse than the boeser one
Apr. 5, 2022 at 12:53 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 3,784
Likes: 975
Boeser is a poor man's Mantha
Apr. 5, 2022 at 1:39 a.m.
#16
BigMeech
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 350
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
And OEL 100% blocks it.


not really
Apr. 5, 2022 at 2:25 a.m.
#17
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 8,085
Likes: 1,479
Stick a fork in Gallagher, ...
Apr. 5, 2022 at 2:51 a.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Quoting: Canucks123
not really


Yeah he would, There's no way Ekman-Larsson would waive for Montreal when he basically said only Boston and Vancouver.
Apr. 5, 2022 at 7:16 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 245
Likes: 59
I agree Boeser for Gallagher is unrealistic because Gallagher is way better than Boeser and Montreal would say no. Hughes+Boeser for Gallagher+Savard is much more even. Canucks might even have to add.
Apr. 5, 2022 at 7:49 a.m.
#20
Jay27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 1,104
Quoting: Habs18
I agree Boeser for Gallagher is unrealistic because Gallagher is way better than Boeser and Montreal would say no. Hughes+Boeser for Gallagher+Savard is much more even. Canucks might even have to add.


And you’ve just officially been out trolled by this guy^
ColonelX liked this.
Apr. 5, 2022 at 9:11 a.m.
#21
Evans truther
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 1,434
Quoting: justaBoss
See that is actually fair. 4 players with bad contracts moving around.

Granted OEL would not waive and MTL already has a plenty of LHDs so it doesn't make sense position wise.

Also Gallagher is two or three years from being on LTIR for good. His playstyle is, quite typically for power forwards, very weary, and the toll on his body will force him to retire before the contract runs it's course.

Oh yeah it's super fair. Montreal ends up getting 5x7.26 for an LD while their barn's full of those instead of keeping Gallagher's 5x6.5 contract just for fun and loses 750k in the meantime. Byron only has one more year and got an A on his shirt so why would they trade 1x3.4 for 2x2.65 on a guy with less leadership skills?
Apr. 5, 2022 at 9:17 a.m.
#22
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,768
Likes: 31,479
Quoting: ColonelX
Oh yeah it's super fair. Montreal ends up getting 5x7.26 for an LD while their barn's full of those instead of keeping Gallagher's 5x6.5 contract just for fun and loses 750k in the meantime. Byron only has one more year and got an A on his shirt so why would they trade 1x3.4 for 2x2.65 on a guy with less leadership skills?


I literally just said it doesn't make sense position wise, but yes value-wise it's pretty close to fair.

All of the players in this exchange are overpaid. Dickinson is younger than Byron with smaller cap hit although yes he has one more year of term.
Apr. 5, 2022 at 9:40 a.m.
#23
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 4,092
Gallagher for Myers and conditional picks.
Every year he hits 20 goals, Montreal gets a 2nd.
If he hits 30 once, Montreal gets a 1st.

If you truly think he's washed up, bet on it.
If he's really a cap dump, he won't cost any picks at all.
EsoYeezus69 liked this.
Apr. 5, 2022 at 9:46 a.m.
#24
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: ColonelX
Oh yeah it's super fair. Montreal ends up getting 5x7.26 for an LD while their barn's full of those instead of keeping Gallagher's 5x6.5 contract just for fun and loses 750k in the meantime. Byron only has one more year and got an A on his shirt so why would they trade 1x3.4 for 2x2.65 on a guy with less leadership skills?


I highly doubt Gallagher and Byron have more leadership qualities than OEL and Dickinson seeing bad how OEL was the CAPTAIN of the Arizona Coyotes for several years
Apr. 5, 2022 at 12:37 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Edited Apr. 5, 2022 at 12:42 p.m.
Quoting: Juiceman
You realize Boeser’s QO is only 1 million dollars more than Gallagher’s cap hit right? I’d soooooooo much rather have Boeser and 7.5 than Gallagher at 6.5. Brad Hunt is our 7th d-man and he currently has a higher point per game average this season than Gallagher. He’s our 7th d-man.


Well a rebuilding team isn’t going to want to give up a pick for that 7.5 million QO just to walk after a year. It might be different if Montreal was a Brock Boeser away from a stanley cup, but they aren’t. And what’s you’re point about hunt having a better ppg? He’s played less games and plays on a better team with more talent. Hunt also has a better ppg than Boyle on the pens and I still wouldn’t trade Boyle for Hunt. Zucker and Zohorna both have a better ppg than Hoglander. Would you trade Hoglander for either of those players? If you’re being honest with yourself, that answer is no.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll