Quoting: Hurricanes_WPG
I think the funniest possibility was that Pinto was betting on the length, date, or amount of his own contract.
It has to have been NHL-related though, even if it wasn't specifically on games. Otherwise, half a season for something that isn't in the CBA (the CBA's only mention of "Gambling" prohibits betting on NHL games but it isn't mentioned otherwise) and that he's accepting without appeal would be ridiculous.
Quoting: Turbo
It seems to be the popular theory but reports are the investigation came as a result of his betting account getting flagged. I don't think him giving inside info to anyone would cause his own account to get flagged.
Illegal hits are often a regrettable split-second decision that players often immediately regret.
Gambling by a player is a willful, premeditated, and deceitful act that means to undermine the integrity of the sport.
The last instance of NHL gambling resulted in lifetime bans for the offenders. He's lucky he got off with only 41 games.
From the initial reports I read, it doesn't sound like actually gambled himself, but that there were "irregularities surrounding his activities." I suspect he provided insider information to someone in order to help influence their bet, or something similar. NHL players are allowed to gamble on non-NHL games.
This was a post in the forum somewhere else. really well put.