Forums/NHL Trades

(OTT/LAK) - Wolanin for Amadio

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Mar 29 at 5:32
#1
Mar 29 at 5:35
#2
Wqrrior
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 7,155
Likes: 2,356
Edited Mar 30 at 12:49
As dead even as it gets. Bottom six energy forward has a place on the Sens.... Bottom pair defender has a place on the Kings. Swap of equivalent surpluses to address both teams needs while exposing each of these guys to better future opportunity.
JGCAHC, capfriendlyaccount, Hockyluv21 and 6 others liked this.
Mar 29 at 5:44
#3
Bench Komorav 4ever
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 8,285
Likes: 5,957
The NHL will never be the same
CEO, capfriendlyaccount, sensonfire and 9 others liked this.
Mar 29 at 5:45
#4
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 10,554
Likes: 5,999
Sad to see Wolanin go, but Ottawa desperately needs skill in Belleville. Amadio is a great AHL level talent, and even if he never makes it as a full time NHLer, it's a worthwhile pickup for Ottawa.

From an LA perspective, if you can deal with the defensive woes, Wolanin can definitely be a good bottom pair D. Skates really well and moves the puck up ice. Passes the puck with confidence.
capfriendlyaccount, Hockyluv21, sensonfire and 3 others liked this.
Mar 29 at 6:19
#5
sensonfire
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 478
This isn't really a trade because both teams could have claimed either other's "trade piece" off of waivers.

Zero value in, zero value out.

I voted fair deal.

Like if you did too grin
Mar 29 at 6:26
#6
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 17,339
Likes: 8,584
Nice exchange for both teams. But note that this trade means that right now, Ottawa doesn't have a fourth qualifying defenseman for the expansion draft.
NLidstrom and Wqrrior liked this.
Mar 29 at 6:28
#7
GM GameV4 Arizona GM
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 1,724
Fair deal, a depth piece swap
Mar 29 at 6:43
#8
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 5,784
Likes: 2,727
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Nice exchange for both teams. But note that this trade means that right now, Ottawa doesn't have a fourth qualifying defenseman for the expansion draft.


It's likely they'll just expose Zaitsev and protect one of the pending UFAs, even if they don't intend to re-sign them. Seems like Z's contract is enough of a deterrent for Seattle to pass.

Alternatively, they could give Coburn a 1 year extension.
SevenLeg and TheBoyDuddus liked this.
Mar 29 at 6:51
#9
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 193
Likes: 196
Quoting: AndrewLadd
The NHL will never be the same


Literally changed the definition of trading in the NHL.
Gmonwy and AndrewLadd liked this.
Mar 29 at 6:54
#10
best poster
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 5,200
Likes: 4,106
Ottawa trading away a former North Dakota player? Shocking.
Mar 31 at 3:14
#11
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,993
Likes: 1,369
Quoting: tkecanuck341
It's likely they'll just expose Zaitsev and protect one of the pending UFAs, even if they don't intend to re-sign them. Seems like Z's contract is enough of a deterrent for Seattle to pass.

Alternatively, they could give Coburn a 1 year extension.


Seattle won't take Z, but his contract doesn't look nearly as bad as it did a year ago. Or while he was in TOR.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit