Edited Mar. 20, 2022 at 2:04 a.m.
Quoting: Juiceman
You proposed Bourgault and a second. Unless you think that Bourgault is worth a third round pick, I don’t see how this would make sense
In reality, lehky is worth 2nd + 3rd, but with him being an rfa, and with the market going up for these players, and the that hughes loves him, and with all the rumors saying Habs atleast want a 1st in the package, it's fair to say Habs only trade lehky for 1st + 3rd. Therefore bourgault + 3rd makes sense. Not saying oilers should or woidl do it, but habs need to get this in exchange in order for them to trade lehkonen. Once again. 2nd + 3rd is fair, but 2nd should be switched to 1st if Habs deal him. He's more valuable to the habs than taking a flyer on a couple of picks. If I was another team, woudl I acquire lehkonen for 1st + 3rd? Absolutely not. If I was the habs, would I trade lehkonen for 2nd + 3rd? Absolutely not. Therfore, it matters if the other team values lehkonen more than 1st + 3rd, because habs value him more than 2nd + 3rd, and it's clear. Therefore, either a team steps up, or we keep him. And I wouldn't be disappointed if we keep him, and I understand if teams wouldn't want to pay our asking price. And other teams should understand our hesitant to trade him for their thinking of what is fair value. Everyone has to look at it from both sides.
I hope that was understandable.
Edit: and I'd like all my Lehkonen trade value critics to read this and understand this.
@capsfan2121 @alfie11 @juiceman