Edited May 13, 2023 at 8:13 a.m.
Imma maybe dig a tad deeper, but if trends continue, the NHL has to adjust. My team didn’t even make the playoffs, I’m not sour grapes about anything, but I’m guessing there is an observable historic trend here:
Potential final 4 of
Dallas - no state tax
Panthers - no state tax
Nevada - no income tax, very low property tax
Carolina - low flat rate income tax
Nearly every other team: variable income tax, some above 10%.
The hard cap is not equal if the required withholdings are not equal. A state or province is a required withholding. If a player will lose a guaranteed 3-4% (or more) of their pay to one state and 0 to the other then the later team gets a 3-4% (or more) discount to the hard cap.
The hard cap should adjust team by team based on these guaranteed differences in player salary. This wouldn’t overcome the fact that the player is still eating the higher tax rate on other money making, such as marketing, sports fitness, spouse occupation, investments, real estate, or the higher property tax rates sometimes found in high tax areas.
It’s truly an unfair playing field. I’m guessing they won’t do this as owners because it inflates player pay. Another option is put all the low tax rates into one division where only one can make it to the conference finals.
Imma just be legit, if it’s the same 8 teams every year, the same 6 or so states - I’m just gonna lose interest.