SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Seattle Kraken signed Kailer Yamamoto (1 Year / $1,500,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:17 p.m.
#1
Kailer Yamamoto has signed a new contract with the Seattle Kraken.
Standard Contract
Comparable ContractsCOMPARE THIS CONTRACT
SIGNED BY: Ron Francis
Length: 1 year
Value: $1,500,000
Expiry Status: RFA (Arb)
Cap % Tooltip: 1.80
Signing Team: Logo of the Seattle KrakenSeattle Kraken
Signing Date: Jul. 2, 2023
Source: CapFriendly

Kailer Yamamoto signed a 1 year, $1,500,000 contract with the Seattle Kraken on Jul. 2, 2023. The contract has a cap hit of $1,500,000.

SEASONClauseCap HitTooltipAAV TooltipP. BonusesTooltipS. BonusesTooltipBase SalaryTooltipTotal SalaryTooltipMinors SalTooltip
2023-24$1,500,000$1,500,000$0$0$1,500,000$1,500,000$1,500,000
TOTAL$1,500,000$1,500,000$0$0$1,500,000$1,500,000$1,500,000
Qualifying OfferTooltip: $1,500,000
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:17 p.m.
#2
1-0 them
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 2,075
good depth foward for seattle
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:17 p.m.
#3
Amirov Forever
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 6,594
Likes: 6,055
I like the fit here, plus Yamo is a Washington guy

Good stuff
RawDeal, TheBoyDuddus, CD282 and 2 others liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:19 p.m.
#4
MStonerForPresident
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 29
Likes: 56
Voting yes. This is good price/volume contract.
RawDeal and TheBoyDuddus liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:25 p.m.
#5
MontrealCanadiensFAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 74
Likes: 89
Yamamoto in Seattle is a great fit. He'll be good in the bottom 6 playing for his hometown team.
RawDeal and TheBoyDuddus liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:26 p.m.
#6
McMann Season
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 950
What a steal for SEA
RawDeal, TheBoyDuddus, Saskleaf and 3 others liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:29 p.m.
#7
WentWughes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 10,720
Likes: 10,275
Great contract, dudes going to cash out next year
TheBoyDuddus liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:34 p.m.
#8
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 34,128
Likes: 20,983
Where's he even gonna play on that team there's no room

Really surprised CHI or ANA didnt go get him
drambui and Kraken liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:39 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 1,443
Great move for Seattle
TheBoyDuddus liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:50 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 88
Likes: 45
Great move for both sides. Has a lot of potential to be the steal of the offseason
TheBoyDuddus liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 4:58 p.m.
#11
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 6,679
If someone was willing to take Yamamoto for 1.5 million, why did the Wings buy him out of his last year instead of retain 50%?
CSStrowbridge liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 5:54 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 772
Likes: 480
I remember there were a lot of Yamamoto to Seattle trades proposed on ACGM, and I didn’t understand them as Seattle didn’t have space in the forward corps and his cap hit of $3.1M was rich for a guy who would be a fourth liner with the Kraken. But with Sprong’s departure from Seattle and Yamamoto being bought out of his previous contract, he now makes sense as a low risk, high reward addition to the team. He’ll still be a fourth liner here, but the fit might be better with Yamamoto in that role as opposed to Sprong since Yamamoto’s a much more sound defender. Hopefully he can recapture the scoring promise he showed in years past and become an impactful contributor on both ends for the Kraken.
Kraken liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:05 p.m.
#13
rangers92
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 25
Likes: 27
This seems like a perfect fit. I smell a 20 goal season
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:10 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 772
Likes: 480
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
If someone was willing to take Yamamoto for 1.5 million, why did the Wings buy him out of his last year instead of retain 50%?


If I had to guess, no one was willing to pay assets for Yamamoto, even at a 50% retained cap hit, so Detroit bought him out to spread the reduced cap over two years instead of one.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:12 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 954
Quoting: aadoyle
Where's he even gonna play on that team there's no room

Really surprised CHI or ANA didnt go get him


There's no guarantees the Kraken keep their lines together but they had some good chemistry last season. Burakovsky back healthy and some turnover in the bottom 6, I think this is what we'll see:

Burakovsky-Beniers-Eberle
Schwartz-Wennberg-McCann
Tolvanen-Gourde-Bjorkstrand
Tanev-Wright-Yamamoto
Kartye
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:13 p.m.
#16
Bedard23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 9,297
Likes: 4,476
Really thought he was heading to Europe
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:20 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,751
Happy for Kailer. He's a good young player, just didn't fit in Edmonton's cap plan. Bonus that his second chance is in his home state.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:21 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,751
Quoting: IconicHawk
Really thought he was heading to Europe


Seriously? He's 100% an NHL player.
Bluetomorrow83, toque, Saskleaf and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:21 p.m.
#19
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 6,679
Quoting: KrakenTheCode
If I had to guess, no one was willing to pay assets for Yamamoto, even at a 50% retained cap hit, so Detroit bought him out to spread the reduced cap over two years instead of one.


Could have done it for FC and then there wouldn't have been any cap hit next season and the same for this season.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:22 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,751
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
If someone was willing to take Yamamoto for 1.5 million, why did the Wings buy him out of his last year instead of retain 50%?


Because Yzerman didn't think it through. He traded for Yamamoto then decided within 24 hours that he didn't want him. Did he explore trades at that point? I don't think there was time.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:41 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 772
Likes: 480
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Could have done it for FC and then there wouldn't have been any cap hit next season and the same for this season.


If the Wings retained 50% of Yamamoto’s salary and traded him for future considerations, $1,550,000 of his cap would have been on their books for this season and nothing next season. By buying him out, he only costs $433,334 against the cap this season, at an opportunity cost of $533,334 next season. I’m guessing Detroit valued the extra $1,116,666 in cap space for this season and were willing to eat a bit of dead cap next season to get that flexibility. Overall though it does raise the question of why Detroit traded for Yamamoto at all if they were just going to buy him out.

Another interesting fact: Sprong and Yamamoto essentially traded places. I actually like the fit for both players on their new teams: Sprong will get the opportunity to hold down a top nine role, a job his play style is better suited for but one he wouldn’t have gotten in Seattle owing to their forward depth. Yamamoto gives the Kraken a more defensively capable winger to slot into their bottom line, and someone who has the potential to rebound into an impact scorer in a lower pressure role than he had in Edmonton.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 6:43 p.m.
#22
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 6,679
Quoting: KrakenTheCode
If the Wings retained 50% of Yamamoto’s salary and traded him for future considerations, $1,550,000 of his cap would have been on their books for this season and nothing next season. By buying him out, he only costs $433,334 against the cap this season, at an opportunity cost of $533,334 next season. I’m guessing Detroit valued the extra $1,116,666 in cap space for this season and were willing to eat a bit of dead cap next season to get that flexibility. Overall though it does raise the question of why Detroit traded for Yamamoto at all if they were just going to buy him out.

Another interesting fact: Sprong and Yamamoto essentially traded places. I actually like the fit for both players on their new teams: Sprong will get the opportunity to hold down a top nine role, a job his play style is better suited for but one he wouldn’t have gotten in Seattle owing to their forward depth. Yamamoto gives the Kraken a more defensively capable winger to slot into their bottom line, and someone who has the potential to rebound into an impact scorer in a lower pressure role than he had in Edmonton.


Stevey Y was high on the guy who came with Yams.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 7:58 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 772
Likes: 480
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Stevey Y was high on the guy who came with Yams.


I guess that makes sense. Perhaps buying out Yamamoto was the cost for the Wings to get Kostin.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 9:39 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 768
Likes: 502
Quoting: KrakenTheCode
If the Wings retained 50% of Yamamoto’s salary and traded him for future considerations, $1,550,000 of his cap would have been on their books for this season and nothing next season. By buying him out, he only costs $433,334 against the cap this season, at an opportunity cost of $533,334 next season. I’m guessing Detroit valued the extra $1,116,666 in cap space for this season and were willing to eat a bit of dead cap next season to get that flexibility.


Detroit is probably less budget conscious than most teams, but they also only have to pay $1.06M over two years (half a million each year) rather than $1.6 million real dollars to whoever the trade partner at 50% would be next summer.
Detroit looked at the bigger picture and decided the money and cap was better spent elsewhere since they could shed 2/3's of it in a under-26 buyout. Clearly no-one was offering anything up for him. That was the price they paid to get to talk to Klim and show they wanted him.

And from Seattle's perspective, taking a $1.5M cap and cash gamble is more attractive than paying a late pick or whatever else for $1.55M cap and $1.6M cash to add him at 50%.

He's a likeable enough player, and I hope he bounces back for his sake, but taking a risk on a free agent is different than giving up something to take the risk even if the numbers were all equal (and they weren't).
Tintin liked this.
Jul. 2, 2023 at 10:37 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 855
Yamamoto at $3.1 million wasn't a terrible contract. It certainly wasn't bad enough to justify being boughtout.

Yamamoto at $1.5 million is an absolute steal.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit