SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The 2016 Penguins Were The Best Team Of This Decade

Created by: AnalyticsGeek
Team: 2019-20 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 9, 2020
Published: Apr. 9, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
In my opinion, the 2016 Pittsburgh Penguins were the best team of this past decade. Though they were perhaps not the most stacked team on paper, their on ice performance was truly an exceptional & dominant effort. Just look at the stats!

In the 2015-16 playoffs, the Penguins had a 52% Corsi, a 55% shot differential, a 57% goal differential, a 56% expected goal differential, a 53% scoring chance differential & a 55% high danger chance differential. The 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks did put up very close numbers, but they had a much lower scoring chance & high danger scoring chance differential.

I will concede that the Los Angeles Kings put up better numbers in terms of goal scores & expected goals while the possession & scoring chance numbers were similar, but I still think the Penguins have the edge because they had a more difficult road to win. While the Kings manhandled the Presidents trophy winners & defending Western champs Vancouver in the first round, they didn’t really face such elite teams afterward in St Louis, Phoenix & New Jersey. The Penguins had to get past the same Rangers team that made it to the finals in 2013-14 & won the Presidents trophy in 2014-15, the Presidents trophy winning Washington Capitals & the defending Eastern Champions in Tampa. I don’t understand why everyone says the Penguins had an easy road to the cup, they had just as tough of a road as the 2013 Blackhawks, if not more. So for these reasons, I think the 2016 Pens team was the best of this decade performance-wise.
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Kunitz, Chris
2$3,750,000
Cullen, Matt
1$800,000
Fehr, Eric
3$2,000,000
Lovejoy, Ben
1$1,200,000
Trades
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
COL
7.
8.
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2021
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$91,857,391$132,500$0-$10,357,391
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Kunitz, Chris
$3,750,000$3,750,000
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,100,000$4,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$6,800,000$6,800,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$850,000$850,000
RW
UFA - 1
Cullen, Matt
$800,000$800,000
Fehr, Eric
$2,000,000$2,000,000
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,750,000$3,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,166,666$3,166,666
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Lovejoy, Ben
$1,200,000$1,200,000
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$874,125$874,125
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,050,000$2,050,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$767,500$767,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$833,750$833,750
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:01 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
mhockey91, NoWah49, Pens3lieve and 1 other person liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:02 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
That defense is extremely mediocre for best of the decade.

Tampa last year choked but the team was better than this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:02 p.m.
#3
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,910
Likes: 23,957


No the 2013 one with Neal, Iginla etc. That was a beast of a team, still can’t believe they got swept by Boston. That team had the best offence I’ve ever seen
Pens3lieve liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:08 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: csick
No the 2013 one with Neal, Iginla etc. That was a beast of a team, still can’t believe they got swept by Boston. That team had the best offence I’ve ever seen


Maybe on paper but the way this team played together was incredible. 2016 pens dominated and controlled possession their entire post season run.
csick and Pens3lieve liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:10 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: BCAPP
That defense is extremely mediocre for best of the decade.

Tampa last year choked but the team was better than this.


Maybe on paper it was better, but clearly, the 2016 Pens had incredible chemistry and had an incredible run in the 2016 playoffs. This team was legit
Pens3lieve liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:10 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: BCAPP
That defense is extremely mediocre for best of the decade.

Tampa last year choked but the team was better than this.


That logic makes zero sense. You're saying a team that didnt win a single game was better than a team who outplayed every team they faced in the playoffs. Talent wise, yes Tampa had more talent, but that doesnt make them the best team
mhockey91 and Pens3lieve liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:15 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
Quoting: csick
No the 2013 one with Neal, Iginla etc. That was a beast of a team, still can’t believe they got swept by Boston. That team had the best offence I’ve ever seen


I still can'[t believe that the Pens had Iginla, and the clown-shoes of a coach played him off wing.
csick, mhockey91 and Pens3lieve liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:16 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: mhockey91
Maybe on paper it was better, but clearly, the 2016 Pens had incredible chemistry and had an incredible run in the 2016 playoffs. This team was legit


They clicked at the right time. There is no denying that, they won the cup. But you asked who the best team was. The Chicago team the year they went on like a 23 game win streak was also better.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:18 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
That logic makes zero sense. You're saying a team that didnt win a single game was better than a team who outplayed every team they faced in the playoffs. Talent wise, yes Tampa had more talent, but that doesnt make them the best team


What do you mean didn't win a single game? I presume you mean playoffs. That team dominated in the regular season. IIRC the Penguins team were out of playoff spot before they fired they're coach. People can add all the silly narratives they want, but in reality what both things show is any team can go hot and cold. This team clicked at the right time, thats why they won and thats why they deserve their cup. Doesn't make them the best team of the decade.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:21 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: BCAPP
What do you mean didn't win a single game? I presume you mean playoffs. That team dominated in the regular season. IIRC the Penguins team were out of playoff spot before they fired they're coach. People can add all the silly narratives they want, but in reality what both things show is any team can go hot and cold. This team clicked at the right time, thats why they won and thats why they deserve their cup. Doesn't make them the best team of the decade.


I never said they were the best team. You brought up Tampa and said that last years team was better. It does not make sense how they are a better team after getting embarrassed in the playoffs. They had more talent, but not a better team
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:39 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 2,165
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
That logic makes zero sense. You're saying a team that didnt win a single game was better than a team who outplayed every team they faced in the playoffs. Talent wise, yes Tampa had more talent, but that doesnt make them the best team


There was an article made at some point saying how the team that wins the cup isnt always the best team, and I think that is relevant here. You can run into a hot goalie, or a team that clicks at just the right time. Not to discount anything the Pens did that year, but Tampa last year was statistically the best team of the decade and its not particularly close.
BCAPP liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:43 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: BCAPP
That defense is extremely mediocre for best of the decade.

Tampa last year choked but the team was better than this.


I said they were the best team performance-wise during the playoffs, not that they were the most stacked team on paper. You can have the most stacked team in the world, but if you can’t perform during playoff time, none of that matters. Just look at the 2016 Pens team’s possession, shot & scoring chance numbers. Even if they had the worst players in the league but still won with those through the roof stats, they would still be considered the best. People just don’t want to look at the facts.
mhockey91 liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:48 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: SlickWilly
There was an article made at some point saying how the team that wins the cup isnt always the best team, and I think that is relevant here. You can run into a hot goalie, or a team that clicks at just the right time. Not to discount anything the Pens did that year, but Tampa last year was statistically the best team of the decade and its not particularly close.


Best stats in the regular season? Yes. But with no cups, there is zero chance the Bolts are the best team of the decade. Regardless if people think the cup champions are the best overall, if they dominate every team you face in the playoffs in terms of possession, shots & scoring chance by a wide margin & end up winning it all, then they are the best team. It doesn’t matter if you have a weak team on paper or just squeaked in at the end of the regular season.
mhockey91 liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 1:53 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: csick
No the 2013 one with Neal, Iginla etc. That was a beast of a team, still can’t believe they got swept by Boston. That team had the best offence I’ve ever seen


Quoting: mhockey91
Maybe on paper but the way this team played together was incredible. 2016 pens dominated and controlled possession their entire post season run.


When the Penguins got swept in 2013, I honestly cried. You rarely get an opportunity to have such a stacked team & they ended up wasting it. I don’t know if the moves were wrong, maybe they shouldn’t have gone after rentals but there were so many good players on that team. Perhaps they added too many new players? It seemed to be Bylsma’s egoistic coaching & Fleury’s monumental choke job that was the main reason.
mhockey91, csick and Pens3lieve liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 3:07 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,579
Likes: 5,454
Quoting: csick
No the 2013 one with Neal, Iginla etc. That was a beast of a team, still can’t believe they got swept by Boston. That team had the best offence I’ve ever seen


That mistake Iginla made...
csick liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 3:30 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,202
Likes: 5,207
1st or 2nd Chicago cup team imo
Apr. 9, 2020 at 3:47 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: leafs101
1st or 2nd Chicago cup team imo


The 2nd Hawks team was very close to the 2016 Pens team in terms of generating possession, shots, scoring chances & goals but not nearly as good.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 4:31 p.m.
#18
Hockey God Genius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 811
Quoting: BCAPP
That defense is extremely mediocre for best of the decade.

Tampa last year choked but the team was better than this.


Last years Tampa Team was a better team than the 16' Pens.... I just sharted a lil & my drink just came out my nose at the same time, while I "SWEPT " tears from my eyes bc I LOL, so hard
Apr. 9, 2020 at 4:39 p.m.
#19
Hockey God Genius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 811


Easily Yes it was.... If Sid, Geno, & Letang could have all stayed healthy, they go down as the best Core ever in modern NHL (since 70's) - & They win at least 1 or 2 more Cups too.
mhockey91 and Pens3lieve liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 4:46 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: Sidstick87
Easily Yes it was.... If Sid, Geno, & Letang could have all stayed healthy, they go down as the best Core ever in modern NHL (since 70's) - & They win at least 1 or 2 more Cups too.


Yes I agree.
Sidstick87 liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 5:09 p.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: SlickWilly
There was an article made at some point saying how the team that wins the cup isnt always the best team, and I think that is relevant here. You can run into a hot goalie, or a team that clicks at just the right time. Not to discount anything the Pens did that year, but Tampa last year was statistically the best team of the decade and its not particularly close.


And what happened to Tampa when it started to matter? They had a great regular season. Once playoffs started, they didnt win a single playoff game. If they were eliminated against another great team, then it wouldn't matter as much, but they got swept against the Blue Jackets.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 6:06 p.m.
#22
Go Preds
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 682
Likes: 229
Colton Sissons scored. That's all I have to say. smile
Apr. 9, 2020 at 6:36 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: SlickWilly
There was an article made at some point saying how the team that wins the cup isnt always the best team, and I think that is relevant here. You can run into a hot goalie, or a team that clicks at just the right time. Not to discount anything the Pens did that year, but Tampa last year was statistically the best team of the decade and its not particularly close.


Thank you. That's my point.

There was also a Chicago team at some point that was crazy good. But yeah that Tampa team was stacked.

They choked hard. Doesn't change that they were the best
SlickWilly liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 6:39 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
I said they were the best team performance-wise during the playoffs, not that they were the most stacked team on paper. You can have the most stacked team in the world, but if you can’t perform during playoff time, none of that matters. Just look at the 2016 Pens team’s possession, shot & scoring chance numbers. Even if they had the worst players in the league but still won with those through the roof stats, they would still be considered the best. People just don’t want to look at the facts.


That's not what the title says nor the first sentence.

Perhaps be clearer.

If you said they were the best performing playoff team of the decade I wouldn't have said a work.

They clicked. They had the HBK line. Murray was awesome. No arguments.
mhockey91 liked this.
Apr. 9, 2020 at 6:42 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Sidstick87
Last years Tampa Team was a better team than the 16' Pens.... I just sharted a lil & my drink just came out my nose at the same time, while I "SWEPT " tears from my eyes bc I LOL, so hard


They choked hard and the pens came together and succeeded. One won the cup and deserves it. But the other team was a better team. They just choked.
Sidstick87 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll