Forums/NHL Signings

Vancouver Canucks signed Tyler Myers (5 Years / $6,000,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options

 

Jul 1 at 12:47
#1
Tyler Myers has signed a new contract with the Vancouver Canucks.
STANDARD CONTRACT
COMPARE THIS CONTRACT
LENGTH: 5 YEARS
EXPIRY STATUS: UFA
SIGNING TEAM: Vancouver CanucksVancouver Canucks
VALUE: $30,000,000
C.H.% : 7.36
SIGNING DATE: July 1, 2019
SOURCE: CapFriendly
SEASONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV P. BONUSES S. BONUSES BASE SALARY TOTAL SALARY MINORS SALARY
2019-20NMC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$6,000,000$1,000,000$7,000,000$7,000,000
2020-21Modified NTC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$0$5,000,000$5,000,000$5,000,000
2021-22Modified NTC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$5,000,000$2,000,000$7,000,000$7,000,000
2022-23Modified NTC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$0$5,000,000$5,000,000$5,000,000
2023-24Modified NTC$6,000,000$6,000,000$0$5,000,000$1,000,000$6,000,000$6,000,000
TOTAL$30,000,000$30,000,000$0$16,000,000$14,000,000$30,000,000$30,000,000
CLAUSE DETAILS: Player submits a 10 team no trade list.
CLAUSE SOURCE: CapFriendly
Jul 1 at 12:47
#2
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 149
Likes: 247
Not as bad as it could have been, but still not worth it.
toque and pinslack liked this.
Jul 1 at 12:48
#3
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1,238
Well, at least its only somewhat buyout proof. Has a full NMC most years, a LNTC the last
Jul 1 at 12:48
#4
Jets
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 456
Likes: 335
Quoting: ProfessorFuzzymuffins
Not as bad as it could have been, but still not worth it.


My thoughts exactly.
Jul 1 at 12:48
#5
TheWolfe
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 110
Likes: 47
Solid signing. About what everyone thought he'd go for and the term isn't terrible

Edit: Deal structure is a little wack
Jul 1 at 12:48
#6
AwesomeMatthews
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 584
Likes: 345
Quoting: ProfessorFuzzymuffins
Not as bad as it could have been, but still not worth it.


Myers is the kind of physical d man the Canucks were missing
Willian_Cardoso liked this.
Jul 1 at 12:48
#7
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 668
Better than originally thought, but it's still a terrible deal.

It's structured so it's virtually buyout proof.
bixyboii liked this.
Jul 1 at 12:48
#8
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 820
Likes: 165
I wouldn't pay Myers more than 1.5M to play for my team if I was a GM
Jul 1 at 12:50
#9
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 445
Likes: 238
Nearly unmovable, buyout proof and probably has an NMC. One of the worst FA signings in the last 10 years, book it.
Jul 1 at 12:54
#10
rangersandislesfan
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 26,179
Likes: 2,588
It's not too bad, but still an overpayment.
Jul 1 at 12:56
#11
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 77
Likes: 57
Saving grace of this contract, no NMC/NTC. Definite overpayment.
Jul 1 at 1:01
#12
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 451
Almost all UFA contracts are overpayments. That's why so many fail. It's a bidding war.
Jul 1 at 2:16
#13
Blues GM v4
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,907
Likes: 2,317
This isn't that bad. Myers is a team's ideal #3 defenseman, and while the money may be a little much, they didn't overpay with term. It's a move that makes sense and drastically improves their team right now. Good on the Canucks for not drastically overpaying for a guy that plays a prime position. He's a good complement to a Quinn Hughes as well.
Jul 1 at 2:29
#14
93in93
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: Random2152
Well, at least its only somewhat buyout proof. Has a full NMC most years, a LNTC the last


He has a full NMC year 1 & a NT for years 2&3
Random2152 liked this.
Jul 1 at 2:30
#15
93in93
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: EmperorFun
Saving grace of this contract, no NMC/NTC. Definite overpayment.


He has a full NMC in year 1 and a full NT in years 2 and 3 with a 10 team NT in the last 2 years
Jul 1 at 2:30
#16
93in93
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 35
Quoting: Sleeping0ut1992
I wouldn't pay Myers more than 1.5M to play for my team if I was a GM


So I guess you would top out in the AHL if you were a GM
rollie1967 liked this.
Jul 1 at 2:41
#17
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 75
Likes: 17
I suppose he gets more because he's the only right hand dman with top 4 pedigree this July. Still too much aav. I was thinking he'd top out at 5mil for a 4-5year term or 4.5ish for a 5+ year term. He's had enough time now to show his worth and I don't see him at this valuation. Was always taking a backseat to Buff and Trouba with the jets; a big dman that seems to shy away from being more physical and never figured out the offensive side of the game. Still, an improvement on the right side for the nucks.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jul 1 at 2:51
#18
J.L.
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 160
Likes: 57
Matching this would have hurt the Jets in a few years.
Jul 1 at 4:54
#19
BtZ's buttercup
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 811
The money upfront is a mistake, Myers is not a top shelf D man.
He is good though
Jul 1 at 5:02
#20
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 80
Likes: 14
Seems like a slight overpayment...but then Stralman signed for 3 years at only 500k less per year.
Term is fine, this isnt a homerun, but not a wtf are you doing Benning either( ala Beagle,Schaller)
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jul 1 at 6:31
#21
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 212
Likes: 42
Very happy with this. Term is fine. AAV is fine. Clauses are fine. Unprotected for expansion is a nice bonus.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jul 1 at 10:17
#22
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 22
Likes: 6
From a Jets perspective, this is great. Myers needed to be gone. From a Canucks perspective, well.... good luck.
Jul 2 at 11:57
#23
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 81
Likes: 52
Quoting: ProfessorFuzzymuffins
Not as bad as it could have been, but still not worth it.


My thoughts exactly. I think this deal will be bad on day one, and yet I couldn't help but think "well it coud have been way worse". The fact that there was this much room for error on this deal does tell me D are still weirdly evaluated by some GMs.
Jul 2 at 10:34
#24
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 553
Likes: 44
I remember a few years ago on here in Jets forum somebody explaining to me why Myers declined w/ some sorta injury/condition thing... So I wouldn't want to invest money in him personally... He just seems like is always injured/over rated but don't produce what is wanted or is on ice when needed... HE will fit in great on CAnucks having said all that wink.
Jul 2 at 11:14
#25
OldNYIfan
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 5,570
Likes: 2,185
Quoting: TheWolfe
Solid signing. About what everyone thought he'd go for and the term isn't terrible

Edit: Deal structure is a little wack


That's to make him easy to move the last year. See Marleau, Patrick.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit