Forums/NHL Trades

(ANA/PIT) - Martinsen for Gudbranson

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options

 

Oct 25 at 4:05
#1
SevenLeg liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:05
#2
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 844
Pittsburgh gets a pick and doesn't retain salary? Easily a win for Pittsburgh.
Random2152, jasondomitrovic, SpaghettiPasta and 5 others liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:06
#3
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 959
Likes: 395
Another steal by Rutherford!
Random2152 and Missouri liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:07
#4
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,659
Likes: 1,773
Pittsburgh wins because they get to not have Erik Gudbranson
Random2152, Earfgang and Missouri liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:08
#5
The evil stats guy
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 1,782
This is impressive, but it would be more impressive if he hadn't traded for him in the first place.
toque, Joe_La_Garnotte, SpaghettiPasta and 7 others liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:09
#6
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 48
Likes: 48
Actually liked Guddy but cap space is cap space I guess. Rutherford needs to snap out of his old Carolina mode
OldNYIfan and Missouri liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:10
#7
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 15,807
Likes: 3,839
So basically Gudbranson for free? Lol
OldNYIfan and MoreOfAnIslesGuy liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:15
#8
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 178
Likes: 101
Quoting: SevenLeg
Another steal by Rutherford!


a 7th rounder counts as a steal tears of joy
pinslack, ALitteral and OldNYIfan liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:16
#9
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 1,895
Poor Gibson
Random2152 and toque liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:18
#10
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 399
Likes: 110
Quoting: Random2152
This is impressive, but it would be more impressive if he hadn't traded for him in the first place.


vancouver thanks you for tanner pearson smile
rcs14e, OldNYIfan and Earfgang liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:22
#11
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,352
Likes: 1,481
everyone said it would cost an arm and a leg to move him and Jack Johnson.
Most people who had a clue knew it wouldn't.

They got back a small return on him. It's not bad. I'm not thrilled with this trade to be honest with you. But I understand why they did it.
They want Marino to get playing time. Letang and Schultz aren't going to sit. So Gudbranson was the odd man out as he couldn't play on the LD side.

Still then need a big body player who is willing to drop gloves and they don't have that now.
There is only one real space on the roster for that type of player and it's on the LD now.

So they are left now with one question on defense.
Who are they trading Johnson for that can be that player. Because that is clearly the next move that needs to be made.
They have forwards to add as sweeteners as they simply have too many guys who are capable of playing at the NHL level.
Oct 25 at 4:24
#12
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 159
Likes: 297
Addition by subtraction. Now to get rid of Jack Johnson.
Oct 25 at 4:24
#13
Jets
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 614
Likes: 480
The fact Gudbranson gets traded twice within a year is proof any contract in the NHL is tradeable
OldNYIfan, Earfgang and CD282 liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:25
#14
Jets
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 614
Likes: 480
Quoting: wojme
Poor Gibson


Dude's back is gonna give out carrying the Ducks this year
wojme, Random2152 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Oct 25 at 4:47
#15
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 764
Quoting: pharrow
everyone said it would cost an arm and a leg to move him and Jack Johnson.
Most people who had a clue knew it wouldn't.


Did Pittsburgh trade Johnson and no one told me?
Oct 25 at 4:48
#16
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,352
Likes: 1,481
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Did Pittsburgh trade Johnson and no one told me?


not yet, but I think most people know it's coming.
One move at a time.
Oct 25 at 5:01
#17
exo2769
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 5,018
Likes: 1,238
I'm surprised PIT got someone to bite, but good for them. This should lead to even more trade IMO.
Oct 25 at 5:19
#18
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 218
Likes: 29
Gudbranson kind of got short changed in Pit. He was always paired with a terrible d partner. Johnson is one of the worst LD in the league. I think if they pair him with Lindholm or Fowler, he might play decent enough.

Then again, it was only a 7th rounder and the ducks have needed another RD since they traded Vatenan and Montour... oh and how are they doing? not great at all. ANd they were "steals" when they were traded too. haha
Oct 25 at 5:23
#19
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 2
Quoting: DDoverChucky
a 7th rounder counts as a steal tears of joy


Better than adding a sweetener
rebecca liked this.
Oct 25 at 5:37
#20
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 233
Likes: 62
This trade tree is slowly flaming out. The 2015 1st rounder (Matt Barzal) has now turned into Andreas Martinsen + 7th round pick (ANA). Ouch!
jasondomitrovic, rebecca, OldNYIfan and 1 other person liked this.
Oct 25 at 5:53
#21
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 288
Quoting: PrisonBull
This trade tree is slowly flaming out. The 2015 1st rounder (Matt Barzal) has now turned into Andreas Martinsen + 7th round pick (ANA). Ouch!


Yep. Just add two Stanley cup championships in between there.
Oct 25 at 5:58
#22
Lets go bolts!
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 587
Likes: 191
I blame adam wylde for this
Oct 25 at 6:00
#23
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 233
Likes: 62
Quoting: DonkeyLips
Yep. Just add two Stanley cup championships in between there.


I would trade a hell of lot more than Matt Barzal for a SC win in Van-City!! We could start with my left nut.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Oct 25 at 6:10
#24
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 1,053
Pittsburgh loses salary and a defenseman, Anaheim gains a RHD that they’ve been wanting. Both teams win the trade.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Oct 25 at 6:15
#25
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: toque
The fact Gudbranson gets traded twice within a year is proof any contract in the NHL is tradeable


His contract length isn’t bad, so that’s why he was able to get moved. Lucic would be a better example.
Joe_La_Garnotte and Earfgang liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit